On last weeks podcast teaser, I played a clip of Parks screwing up and calling Perry Riley, Riley Perry. However, the point he was attempting to make was a valid one (never thought I'd say that about Parks...) about the situation at inside linebacker. At this point, London Fletcher is due to become a free agent, leaving Riley and Keyaron Fox as the starting inside linebackers. Now it's assumed that Fletcher will be back, I can't see a situation where he's not playing in the burgundy and gold next year, but he can't play forever. We all are hopeful that Riley can develop into his replacement. But even if he does, that still leaves a hole in the defense, with our defense having two inside linebackers. Parks suggested a couple of names, the most likely of which was Stephen Tulloch, so I thought I'd profile him.
At 5'11", 240 pounds, the 27 year-old Tulloch is similar in size to Fletcher. Some may believe this is too small for the 3-4 defense, but Fletcher proved that height doesn't matter if you can play. Tulloch racked up 111 tackles, three sacks and two interceptions during the regular season, and followed that up with 15 combined tackles, two passes defended and a forced fumble in the playoff defeat to Saints.
I could sit here and show you a load of pictures of him stuffing the run, but instead I'm going to focus on his coverage ability. Coverage is a very underrated aspect in linebackers, particularly inside linebackers. Think about it, how many times do you hear talk about tight ends like Rob Gronkowski, Jimmy Graham and even our own Fred Davis creating mis-matches because linebackers can't cover them. Now if you have a linebacker that can keep up with those guys and cover them, surely he's a valuable asset? The Lions liked to utilize the ability of their front four pass-rushers, and therefore asked Tulloch to drop back into coverage a lot.
Film breakdown after the jump...

In this red zone situation, Tulloch is in man coverage with the fullback of the Cowboys.
Quick pressure forces Romo to check down to the fullback. This is exactly the kind of play where a fullback can come under the radar and get a touchdown.
But Tulloch is right there and chases him down for a minimal gain, forcing third and goal.
Covering a fullback out of the backfield isn't something that's going to make teams go out and get him. Let's see how he does when he drops into a zone against Cowboys tight end Jason Witten.
Witten enters Tulloch's zone in the middle of the field.
Knowing he has no safety help in the middle of the field, Tulloch opens his hips and runs with Witten.
Tulloch then jumps underneath the route and gets his finger tips to the ball. He juggles it, but eventually comes down with it for the interception.
We move on from the Dallas game to Carolina. The Lions are holding onto a lead late in the game, and Tulloch makes two big plays that give his team the win. Here's the first.
Here you see Tulloch covering a zone in the middle of the field. One of the Panthers receivers is running a post route in behind Tulloch's zone.
Tulloch watches Newton's throw all the way and makes a break for the ball. He manages to get a finger tip deflection on it.
But that tip is enough to take it off the path of the receiver, and into the hands of the safety for the interception.
The Lions went on to score from the resulting possession, but the game wasn't fully wrapped up then. The Panthers still had a minute on the clock.
Tulloch again drops into a zone in the middle of the field.
As Newton releases the ball, Tulloch makes a break on the ball.
Tulloch undercuts the route and this time gets the interception himself. This killed any hopes of a comeback for the Panthers and sealed the win for the Lions. Two big plays in key situations.
But of course it's not all about coverage. In the 3-4 defense, Tulloch would also be asked to blitz on occasion.
Back to the Dallas game, Tulloch is blitzing up the middle on 3rd down.
He presence up the middle forces Romo to look to his hot read out of the backfield, rather than check the middle of the field for the open receiver.
Then, just because we all love to see it, Tulloch delivers a big hit to Romo. That's always a plus in my book.
But alas, he doesn't get the sack on that play.
Here we see Tulloch up against one of the harder to bring down quarterbacks in Tim Tebow. The back is going to come across and chop block him.
He gets chopped while Tebow is looking down field for a pass. But Tebow can't find anyone and attempts to break the pocket and scramble.
Tulloch manages to stay in the play and makes an extra effort to get back up and bring down Tebow, which he does successfully.
So what do you guys think? Am I overrating his coverage ability and linebackers in coverage in general? I think Tulloch would add something to this defense that we don't have already. Put him alongside Fletcher and drop Riley back to the third inside linebacker on the depth chart would provide good solid depth, and would help us transition once Fletcher does decide to pack it in. Tulloch fits in the mold of free agents we signed last year. He's relatively young, not a particularly flashy signing and won't cost a great deal. But he would provide a solid starter and add to an already formidable front seven.
1 recs | 27 comments
I like him
But Parks is backtracking… I have you on record stating that Fox is adequate as London’s replacement.
Skins Fan '77 - February 13, 2012
He's adequate but still a backup
I really think Tulloch ends up on the Eagles. Unless they want to go after Kuechly with a consolation prize of Burfict, Hightower
Parks Smith - February 13, 2012
I wonder if they can even afford Tulloch
I can’t imagine they have a lot of cap space after last year. But their need at LB is obvious, so it would make sense.
willster - February 14, 2012
The Eagles have some money to spend, but a lot will be earmarked to DeSean Jackson
Steve Shoup - February 14, 2012
Fox is a FA too
he’ll need to be re-signed as well
Tiller56 - February 14, 2012
Another great post UK
I’m a big fan of Tulloch if London leaves, or the Skins feel they can upgrade next to him i’d be a big fan. And that coverage ability can’t be underrated, his ability to take away a spot on the field or man up against some good TE’s and backs is key. That is the area that will probably fail London first, and could be invaluable for the Skins.
Steve Shoup - February 13, 2012
Do you think it would be better plan to grab Tulloch and play him with London?
It seems like coverage-wise that London and Riley Perry Ellis are of the same mold and could be a bit of a liability. Especially with a white guy at safety. A team like Balmer could exploit us.
Parks Smith - February 13, 2012
haha nice use of "Balmer"
Bringing him in next to Fletcher would be ideal, the question is can they afford to spend that much on ILB. with the news that the cap room from this past year can carry over, that could give the Skins the extra wiggle room they need to make this type of move.
Steve Shoup - February 13, 2012
Isn't the carry over like $13 mil? Crazy stuff...
Parks Smith - February 13, 2012
yep, so the Skins have some extra money to spend in a really strong FA class
Steve Shoup - February 13, 2012
If I got Tulloch then i would not bring back London
I just dont see signing London and Tulloch, I like Perry Riley and if you gonna get Tulloch i think it make London expendable
Highspeed30 - February 13, 2012
I agree
Parks Smith - February 13, 2012
I don't know that I want Perry Riley demoted again
he really came on when we gave him some playing time. Let’s see if the kid will develop further. If we really want to start preparing for life after London, then draft a young guy in the mid-rounds and let him study like Riley did.
CarverM - February 13, 2012
Yea I'm kind of flip flopping on that also.
Parks Smith - February 13, 2012
Who's Perry Riley?
I only know a Riley Perry
UkRedskin - February 13, 2012
Riley Perry Ellis, actually
Parks Smith - February 13, 2012
Who, other than Skins fans watch a mid-round linebacker develop into a good young player,
And then the first thing we say is “sign a free agent to replace him?”
Holy horseknuckles!
iH8dallas - February 13, 2012 via mobile
Who said that?
Parks Smith - February 13, 2012
I think it would be
Prosterous to “choose someone” over Fletcher right now. I understand we are rebuilding, but you still need guys like Fletcher on your team; guys who work harder than anyone, AND are willing to help bring along the younger guys.
OK, now that THAT’S out of the way, let me say this – I also think that when we DO finally say goodbye to Fletcher, we should TRY to land a more “sizeable” ILB. As much as I love LFB, he is a liability in coverage, especially on the big tight ends. And, now that the TE position seems to be evolving rather rapidly, I think an ILB more suitable for covering these guys is essential.
CJHutch - February 13, 2012
Agree on all accounts
We have enough problems without creating another one by not bringing LFB back. He knows our defense, and he can continue to help bring the young guys along. But we definitely need a new young ILB who will match up better against the freakish TE’s that are popping up these days. Draft him, and hopefully he’ll be ready to accept the torch when London hangs it up.
willster - February 14, 2012
Tulloch had a good season in 2010 and yet he was one of the last ILB signed in free agency. UkRedskin's film
review showed that Tulloch was able to cover in pass defense. The Lions seemed to use him differently than the Titans.
The rap going into the 2011 season may have been that his pass defense was weak but he did OK in the film shown for this post. “2. Stephen Tulloch, MLB, Detroit Lions – Contract: One-year, $3.25m
Impact: When you adopt a scheme that sees your defensive line getting up the field, you’re going to need your linebackers to be adept at taking on linemen. In 2010 that was a big problem for the Lions, and they’ve had issues with it at times this year, but to nowhere near the same degree. A large part of that has been the signing, and subsequent play, of Stephen Tulloch. It was truly baffling that there wasn’t a stronger market for the former Titan who was coming off a superb year, but the Lions are reaping the benefits now. Our second ranked MLB on the year.” http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/11/10/top-10-free-agents-making-an-impact/ “That said, Tulloch’s pass coverage improved dramatically from 2009 (-5.9) to 2010 (+8.3), and with Suh and Fairley occupying blockers on the front line, Tulloch will still get more than his fair of free paths to opposing running backs. Look for Tulloch to finish with 110 solo tackles, 35 assists, 1-2 sacks and INTs and a handful of passes-defensed.” http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2011/07/31/fantasy-reaction-detroit-lions-sign-stephen-tulloch/ The Lions head coach had some inside knowledge of Tulloch since he had been his coach for 3 seasons with the Titans.
Jefferson1935 - February 13, 2012
I know he is more of a 4-3 MLB but Curtis Lofton is in a mess down in the ATL
After a huge year of 147 tackles (87 solo), Mike Nolan wants to remove Lofton from their “sub” third-down packages. I don’t know about you but I think that’s a sign that he is going to sign elsewhere, because he was born to be a 3 down backer.
He is more than likely asking for the “David Harris contract” of around 4 years/$36 mil.
Anyone have any thoughts on him?
Ohio Redskins - February 14, 2012
I like Lofton and think he'll fit
he’ll def. be more expensive than Tulloch, but if Fletcher leaves he’s an option.
Steve Shoup - February 14, 2012
I wanted him in the draft
When we picked Devin Thomas.
CJHutch - February 14, 2012
Does anyone else wish we would have made a hard play for Aaron Curry?
The Raiders got him for a 2012 7th round pick, and a conditional 5th in 2013.
Tiller56 - February 14, 2012
I definitely hoped we would simply because I knew the 'Hawks weren't asking for much
He’s got the talent that you have to believe the right destination would turn him loose. We’ll never know if we were that place.
Ohio Redskins - February 14, 2012
there is some talk that he might be cut with the new staff in Oak
The Raiders are over the projected cap (even after the Routt release) and they want to tag or re-sign Branch, so they will need to cut some players, and I’d guess Curry will be one of them since they could save $5 million.
Steve Shoup - February 14, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Hogs Haven to post a comment.